~activist

Hi comrade!

Commies don't eat children

--

"And did you get what
you wanted from this life, even so?
I did.
And what did you want?
To call myself beloved, to feel myself
beloved on the earth."

Raymond Carver

That's for me to know, and you to find out.

Hey, mind telling me what osmosis means? Without first hitting it in a dictionary?

Warning: User aborted response ; Intellectual Osmosis imminent.

Quoting other people, copying other people's art...
Is there anything to you that doesn't consist of someone else?
You already lost the discussion. Creating half-hearted excuses (or using ones other people made up - more your style) won't help.

I dunno, I stopped arguing with ~ Davaeorn because I felt the intellectual osmosis draining from my IQ. Forgive me for quoting the Gord, but I feel it's appropriate here.

"So there Joan was, trapped talking to an idiot. Ever resourceful, she came up with this...

"I'm sorry, I'm afraid I subscribe to the theory of intellectual osmosis. As such, I must now cease our conversation and move away from you before my intelligence begins to drop. Good day."

Then Joan walked away. The members of DA had a very good laugh and had to explain to the idiot what Joan meant, and he was very pissed. I don't think he ever came back."

Now it's talking to itself AND responding and all the while making a mess on my page like an un-potty-trained 3 year old.

anyone got any bug zappa?

--
A C T I V I S T S

Because the World will not change all by its self.

Join Activists

Ok. This is now officially over. From now on, anything you write (or not write) will be concieved by me as "I am sorry for bothering you in the first place, I was wrong and didn't realise so until now.".

Back there again... We've already concluded that if I am a troll, then so are you.

You are a troll, I could have provided my counter argument, but I'd prefer not to. Simple as that

Yeah, just like last time? When i messaged you and you got too owned to reply? Why did you reply to that message and not to the last one?
I agree there's a difference. Wheres your point?

"There is a difference between trolling and icecream". Yeah sure but totally irrelevant

Just to tell you that there's a difference between losing an argument and losing the point of arguing with someone whose logic is a non-ligical one. And in this case, it's the latter.

And I DID walk away, you're the one who messaged me this time.

Nice evasion try... oh wait. It wasn't nice.
You got it handed to you. If you keep going you'll get more back. If you walked away... why did you write me back now?

Some people are just too dumb.

I'm just being the better person and walking away from it, I have better things to do, like Draw, and Writing Music, both of which you'd only dream of hoping to match my proficiency in. Besides your web of logic is too unsalvageable, it appears that it's some sort of grudge you hold, because you're not man enough to take a comment he made in your gallery.

Besides, I've exposed enough dirt on you, I've felt it's time the moderators come to clean it up.

Toodles! We won't miss you. ^_~

Oh, you gave up. I'd feel pretty stupid now if I were you... letting a dumb kid beat me in a discussion.
*rubs it in*

Shrug. You did a good effort anyway. Shame it didn't last.

wow, can't believe this thing is still crawling around on my page.


matter of time now . . . . . . . . . .

--
VISIT ACTIVISTS

The Art of Rebellion

Once again, I never said I was smart. Neither do I have any problems being flamed and trolled by people who've turned whining into a hobby. If they need to be told that the whole activist scene is a nuisance created by some morons with too little attention and too much time, then I can make the sacrifice to be the one that tells them.

Where are all your other clever points now? You just abandoned them? Well, look at it from the bright side... things can only get better for you from here ^__^

It still doesn't change the fact that Antagonizing Activist is wrong. You, on the other hand have gotten it coming. You don't go to a gay-bar and yell "I hate gays!!!" in front of all of them and expect not to get beaten up in return, do you, in the same manner you shouldn't come here and essentially say "I hate Activists!" and not expect us to shun and reproach you, but you still do so, why? If you're so smart why did you do such a stupid thing?

"besides I am telling the truth about your low intelligence"

Just like I was telling the truth about Activist? I really fail to note the difference.

1. I never claimed to be intelligent. How's that for ironic, eh?
2. Scart insulted me first, just like you did. Great, two trolls on me.
3. Funny how you think that you are something else than a product of some random psychology literature. Thats called, um, pseudo-intellectual.
4. So, you weren't flaming me when you noted my lack of intelligence? Thanks for confirming that I wasn't flaming activist. I was just noting his lack of intelligence. Tool.

The more you flap your gums, the more it shows what you really are.

I did not flame you at all, besides I am telling the truth about your low intelligence, you didn't know when to not troll, you didn't realize the err in jumping on Activist, and you didn't take into account that snakes bite back if you step on their tail. And yes, it was unprovoked, hshe has every right to post whatever she wants whithin the rules, and nothing you say is gonna stop that.

I am actually amused by this, really, I'm just relaxing peeling back the flimsy layers of your logic and exposing more and more of your irrationality. I never noticed you trying to keep the convo clean, I can tell very well that you're getting pissed.

Oh, and

"Intelligent people doesn't resort to insults at ALL."

You just proved yourself that you lack intelligence by resulting to insults towards Scart. How's that for ironic, eh?

Just admit that you're wrong and walk away, will ya, if you're a man, that is.

I did not flame you at all, besides I am telling the truth about your low intelligence, you didn't know when to not troll, you didn't realize the err in jumping on Activist, and you didn't take into account that snakes bite back if you step on their tail. And yes, it was unprovoked, hshe has every right to post whatever she wants whithin the rules, and nothing you say is gonna stop that.

I am actually amused by this, really, I'm just relaxing peeling back the flimsy layers of your logic and exposing more and more of your irrationality. I never noticed you trying to keep the convo clean, I can tell very well that you're getting pissed.

Oh, and

"Intelligent people doesn't resort to insults at ALL."

You just proved yourself that you lack intelligence by resulting to insults towards Scart. How's that for ironic, eh?

Just admit that you're wrong and walk away, will ya, if you're a man, that is.

You don't resort to insults? No, I guess spamming me with messages of how low intelligence i possess isn't insulting. Yeah, thats it.

*NOTE* I did not write to you in the first place. You begun flaming me and degrading my intelligence for no reason. Or for the same reason America invaded Iraq. Which is better?

Unprovoked? If people can post art depicting dead americans included in some pro-jihad pro-racial hate campaign, then for sure I can tell a guy what i think of his attitude.

*SECOND NOTE* I wasn't harassing Activist, I was giving him my oppinion. He could have taken that as a man but for some reason he didn't. I can't help if he's a insecure bastard needing to DEDICATE h


"because if your goal is to piss people off, I grade it an "F". " - this sentence doesn't make sense at all. Firstly, I should have gotten an "A", because obviously i pissed both you, activist, and that other prissy Scart up pretty bad for you to waste this much time over me. Secondly, how would "even when you resort to insults" be of any value as a comment? You're basically saying that intelligent people resort to insults and win, and stupid people resort to insults and lose. Wrong again. Intelligent people doesn't resort to insults at ALL. Notice how I've been trying to keep this conversation clean? You just destroyed that by initiating a flame war. Good job. master of pseudo-intellectuality.

It doesn't because:

1., I don't resort to insults
2., I AM right in telling you're wrong, and you're wrong in harassing Activist in the first place.
3., Your insults are unprovoked, I am merely reproacing you.
4., Me harassing you only applies if it's in your userpage, but alas it wasn't to be.

There ya go, happy now? I suggest that you give up, you just don't have enough intelligence to win even when you resort to insults because if your goal is to piss people off, I grade it an "F".

Convince me? Try providing arguments?

Really. Your sense of logic could use some practise, because you don't seem to see that everything you charge me of goes for you too. Are you perhaps going to say anything else than "you are wrong, I am right", so I could take you seriously?